Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:20:33 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp Message-ID: <20030925012033.A567@grosbein.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com>; from ru@freebsd.org on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:04:42PM %2B0300 References: <200309241429.h8OETrhk097904@freefall.freebsd.org> <3F71ADCA.7090408@tenebras.com> <20030924162111.GA23542@sunbay.com> <3F71C733.6070708@tenebras.com> <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:04:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Right. But static ARP means something different. It means > that the APR table is frozen, but system will still reply > to ARP requests for its addresses, which is not done if > IFF_NOARP flag is set on an interface. Realization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/40763 In production for years. Of course, it is better to apply patch from SA. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030925012033.A567>