Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Oct 1999 20:28:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:      <up@3.am>
To:        Deepwell Internet <freebsd@deepwell.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NetApp servers
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.9910072026580.5589-100000@richard2.pil.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991007152026.02f2f9d0@mail1.dcomm.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

If you're looking for reliability with NFS, check out qmail with Maildir.
It solves the locking issues, but on a really large scale, it may bring up
inode issues.  Nonetheless, I believe it's still what Hotmail uses.

On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Deepwell Internet wrote:

> The Earthlink whitepaper is at
> http://www.earthlink.net/about/papers/mailarch.html
> 
> but I agree.  It looks like a cheezy hack.
> 
> 
> Can anyone point me to good documentation of building highly scalable web 
> servers or mail servers?  I'd like to explore some different designs and 
> look at how they scale and increase reliability.
> 
> I noticed that Geocities offers all user pages at 
> www.geocities.com/~username.  How do you suppose they are implementing 
> this?  A large Sun box or two with NFS?
> 
> 
> At 11:51 PM 10/7/99 +0200, you wrote:
> >Damian Hamill wrote:
> >
> > > Can anyone put any figures on what it costs to install and run a large
> > > scale email service (say > 10,000 users) using a NetApp file server,
> > > i.e. what are the real costs in terms of all the hardware components
> > > and also how many man hours per month to look after it etc.  Any real
> > > life examples out there ?
> >
> >Very expensive, since all mail software needs to lock files it's writing
> >to.  NFS is stateless, a lock is state information, so by design any
> >implementation of such is already a gross hack.
> >
> >I suggest getting a RAID controller, preferably a SCSI-SCSI one.  Cost is
> >about a third of a NetApp.  If you really want a purple box in your racks
> >use them to store web pages or user home directories (i.e. stuff you need
> >on several machines at the same time and that will hardly be written to).
> >
> >EarthLink do run mail on NetApps.  They have a white paper somewhere on
> >their website describing their setup (which involves some hacks in local
> >delivery agents and POP3 daemons to work around the locking issue).
> >
> >
> >         -- Niels.
> >
> >
> >
> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
> 

James Smallacombe		      PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up@3.am							    http://3.am
=========================================================================
ISPF 3 - The Forum for ISPs by ISPs(tm)  ||  Nov 15-17, 1999, New Orleans
3 days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and brightest.
     Visit <http://www.ispf.com/>; for information and registration.
=========================================================================



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.9910072026580.5589-100000>