Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 00:31:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, kjc@csl.sony.co.jp, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: struct ifnet handling... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980520002407.21215A-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <19980520001008.55413@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 May 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > I'm not certain what you mean by 'pre-defined chains'. I pointed out > where there were logical splits, based on an automated transform of > rules. These differences _are_ there, no matter what - there are > those 6 classes of rules (at least). > > BTW: The concept of 'chains' are used on the Ciscos (there called > 'rule lists' IIRC). what's so difficult about: 100 [common rules always done] 1000 skipto 4000 in recv ed0 1100 skipto 4500 out xmit ed0 1200 skipto 5000 in recv de0 1300 skipto 5500 out xmit de0 1400 skipto 6000 via lo0 4000 [ed0 incoming chain] 4490 skipto [common reject code] 4500 [ed0 outgoing chain] 4990 skipto [common reject code] 5000 [de0 incoming chain] 5490 skipto [common reject code] 5500 [de0 outgoing chain] 5990 skipto [common reject code] 6000 [lo0 rules] 6990 skipto [common reject code] (?) julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980520002407.21215A-100000>