Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:47:10 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Don O'Neil <don@lizardhill.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Bj?rn K?nig' <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: 4.X Binaries on 5.X or 6.X? Message-ID: <20060227204709.GA49399@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <004e01c63bdd$56724b60$0300020a@mickey> References: <44035BDB.2030109@cs.tu-berlin.de> <004e01c63bdd$56724b60$0300020a@mickey>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:35:24PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote: > I haven't tried running them yet, I'm just asking since I'm planning on > building a new server and would prefer to use 5.x or 6.x rather than 4.11 > which my old server is running.=20 >=20 > I guess the best way to find out is to try... I was just asking if there > _could_ be any issues. >=20 > If you were in my position, would you install 5.4 or 6.0? I noticed there > are quite a lot of changes in 6.0 and it requires at least 5.3 for upgrade > purposes... So my question is, is it really ready for 'prime time'?=20 Absolutely yes. Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEA2VNWry0BWjoQKURAmv/AJ4t4TC+r+R3K/AxmlsLmtYYspNz3ACfZV/l O+pVaAh/s3BmPhQrQMyAzqA= =Zy2H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060227204709.GA49399>