Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:14:28 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/svnmerge Makefile Message-ID: <4F329154.5070303@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3289C3.2050203@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202081353.q18DrNIb053278@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120208141921.GB25593@FreeBSD.org> <4F3289C3.2050203@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
bump done, out of an abundance of precaution.
On 2/8/12 9:42 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2012.02.08. 15:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:53:23PM +0000, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> > scheidell 2012-02-08 13:53:23 UTC
>>> > > Modified files:
>>> > devel/svnmerge Makefile
>>> > Log:
>>> > - Bump PORTEPOCH
>> It seems that previous package could not be generated, which means no
>> PORTEPOCH bump is necessary. You still have some time to revert it
>> before
>> it spreads out to the mirrors (less than an hour).
> He got an erwinmail, which he forwarded to me because svnmerge-1.6.17
> < svnmerge-1.7.2. So it seems the bump is necessary.
>
> Gabor
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F329154.5070303>