Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <86irrwre3y.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> (Harti Brandt's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:09:43 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203090804.Q59587@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> writes: > The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs, > 512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the > crosscompiler that is different? Different CFLAGS perhaps? DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.nohelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86irrwre3y.fsf>