Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:10:44 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: "Heiko W.Rupp" <hwr@pilhuhn.de> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Total lookup under -CURRENT (me too) Message-ID: <MuKWWimyb6@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <m0tHttC-0005KzC@pilhuhn.sub.org>; from "Heiko W.Rupp" at Tue, 21 Nov 95 15:41 MET References: <m0tHttC-0005KzC@pilhuhn.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <m0tHttC-0005KzC@pilhuhn.sub.org> Heiko W.Rupp writes: >Andrey Chernov: >:|As I already say, all system processes which not access UFS continue >:|to work, i.e. slip/telnet/kermit, etc. >:|I suspect pure UFS code was damaged with new async addition. >:|Kernel from Oct 1 works fine. >Here I am not sure, as 2.1-stable has the same problems. If I recall >right these appear even if ``async'' is not set. So if you say >UFS-problems than these must be in 'normal' UFS code. And I mean that even if async not set normal UFS code is damaged by async changes. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MuKWWimyb6>