Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 04:06:05 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c src/sy Message-ID: <394A7A9D.5A354553@newsguy.com> References: <XFMail.000616141108.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > The correct here is find _why_ there is a performance impact if this > > delay accept feature is not used, and fix _that_ instead. > > Well, my naivity abounds, but I would have thought it was because you do an > accept() which returns and then immediatly you go back to waiting on select(). Use kqueue then. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org "He is my minion, so he doesn't need a name." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?394A7A9D.5A354553>