Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 May 1998 21:48:24 +0200
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Compatibility with Ultra IDE drives?
Message-ID:  <19980528214824.A12555@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980528110226.2373R-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>; from Doug White on Thu, May 28, 1998 at 11:04:17AM -0700
References:  <19980528102719.D342@freebie.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980528110226.2373R-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Doug White:
> Hm, I'll have to demo a UltraDMA computer.  I'm only on standard IDE.  Is
> UltraDMA tothe point where it actually is a win?  Originally the critics
> were saying there was no win with ultradma. 

The main difference is PIO vs DMA. UltraDMA should not make any real
difference because no disk is able to push that much data out... 

You can get 11 or 12 MB/s from a modern drive (maybe a bit more with 10k
rpms but they're not available to IDE) so having an IDE interface at 33
MB/s is useless IMO.

Having a bigger bandwidth is useful for SCSI because you can disconnect but
access to devices is "sequential" on an IDE bus.
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #60: Fri May 15 21:04:22 CEST 1998

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980528214824.A12555>