Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:30:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: but withoutI WITNESS and INVARIANTS ? (was: Re: General-CURRENT status) Message-ID: <20040514152916.D15395@pcle2.cc.univie.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20040514155152.4d6dee6b@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> References: <40A3F1D5.5010209@bellsouth.net> <20040514155152.4d6dee6b@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2004 17:08:21 -0500 > Nilson <nilson@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > I was wondering about the general status of the -CURRENT branch - is it > > horribly broken, or usable? > > > > I am wanting to bring my server back up to the latest -CURRENT (I last > > built a kernel and world about a month ago) > > How safe is it to run it without WITNESS and INVARIANTS ? > > My -CURRENT are pretty stable an I was wondering if they would do OK > without: INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT and WITNESS. All of these options are meant for debugging purposes. So removing them will not just not hurt, but also improve performance. :-) cheers, le -- Lukas Ertl http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ le@FreeBSD.org http://people.freebsd.org/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040514152916.D15395>