Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 May 2001 20:31:05 -0500
From:      Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>
To:        Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki@mediaone.net>
Cc:        Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: soft update should be default
Message-ID:  <20010504203105.A20797@cec.wustl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010504213412.3ee36a4f.tadayuki@mediaone.net>; from tadayuki@mediaone.net on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:34:12PM -0400
References:  <20010504205142.1a7013e6.tadayuki@mediaone.net> <20010504200443.A20673@cec.wustl.edu> <20010504213412.3ee36a4f.tadayuki@mediaone.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:34:12PM -0400, Tadayuki OKADA wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2001 20:04:43 -0500
> Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx> wrote:
> > It only adds performance... the whole idea of soft updates is to get
> > async speed with sync reliability. Nothing is more reliable than
> > synchronous writes, since data is verified absolutely as it is written.
> I've heard that it always keeps consistency.
> So you can skip fsck after the crash.
> I don't know the detail, so please someone correct me if I'm wrong.

It does keep things consistent... but this does not add reliability over
synchronous writes. 

> > Still... I do agree it should be the default, or at least an option that
> > can be set at install time. I think this summer I will be reinstalling
> > my system, to clean up the cruft that ~1/2 year of learning has built up
> > on my system. It would sure come in handy then.
> You can set it from the menu if you install 4.3-RELEASE.

This is just what I need then.

-- 
Andrew Hesford
ajh3@chmod.ath.cx

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010504203105.A20797>