Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 01:21:38 +0100 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Google Chrome Message-ID: <20080904012138.4ff77804@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080904004712.R1670@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <da7069940809021338s686fc5a0pbf226363ec8f6427@mail.gmail.com> <57057966651240527470195062000340979511-Webmail2@me.com> <26682.8228872784$1220442858@news.gmane.org> <g9ltvn$m0m$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080903135750.F2188@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080903151335.0454e929@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080904004712.R1670@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:47:34 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > For most people that's already happened, except that it's > > Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and > > open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to > > me. > > except it leads to google-everything. not even a bit better than > microsoft-everything There's a lot of difference. Microsoft has always tried to undermine standards because standards give its competitors a more level-playing field, which is what Google needs for its webapps to compete with Microsoft's desktop applications. I don't see how that's bad for anyone except Microsoft.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080904012138.4ff77804>