Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:37:03 +0200 From: Dennis Berger <db@bsdsystems.de> To: Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd@omx.ch> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS status now in June? / stable enough for a file server? Message-ID: <4679115F.4070407@bsdsystems.de> In-Reply-To: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> References: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a backupserver running CURRENT with ZFS on a 500gb volume. I use ssync and nfs to sync our production server, and do hourly snapshots since 2-3 month. It never paniced or something like that and is a lot faster than my 6.2 box was. regards, -Dennis Olivier Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > I have to setup a file storage server (non-critcal, just as secondary > backup server) and I am wondering if would be a realistic idea to start > using ZFS. I spent some time browsing the lists and newsgroups, and the > status wiki page looks "good": http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS . > > The http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html page also states: > June 2007 Start FreeBSD 7.0 Release Process, so this may also be > a positive point about overall stability? :) > > It would be to store lots of data, and the FS-compression feature of ZFS > would be quite interesting for this server. Of course I'd be glad to > help debugging any issues I may see. > > So if you are already using ZFS in "pre-production", I would be glad for > a short "go/no go" feedback, thanks :-) > > regards, > Olivier > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4679115F.4070407>