Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:28:52 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: OS comparision oh oh Message-ID: <20051219132852.GD687@gothic.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <1134996653.68994.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <1134995594.68994.7.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20051219124848.GC687@gothic.blackend.org> <1134996653.68994.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:50:53PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Marc Fonvieille pí?e v po 19. 12. 2005 v 13:48 +0100: > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:33:14PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html > > > > > > This page just got nicely flamed on OSnews ... > > > perhaps it's time to take this six years old material down? > > > It makes us look like morons today. > > > > > > > It's time to find a real volunteer to really update this document :) > > it's why Murray added it to the tree. > > So until that happens, may I at least remove the links that point to it, > and put a fat bold banner on top of it saying "outdated" ? > Removing the link would reduce the chances someone decide to help in updating it. I'd prefer to see a "outdated" note, since it's about win2000 and linux in 2000... The outated notice should be also added on http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/ links ("FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows 2000 : How does your OS compare?" and "How does your OS compare"). Marc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDprWTzQ9RwE+OdOgRArZEAKCWZyhf48ynCGjaC8V5wI0zDIsKZACdGa9J 9B8OvzDQ8Ea+MrCtUcK5RHo= =r5Gl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051219132852.GD687>