Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:00:36 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce text(code) size and improve clarity of pkg_add Message-ID: <20010730090036.A59209@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010729145916.D94563@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:59:17PM -0700 References: <20010727214412.A91434@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010729145916.D94563@xor.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:59:17PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > 1. s_strl* is obvious some form of "safe" strl{cpy,cat}. But *WHAT*
> > does it make "safe"? Isn't obvious w/o having to track down the
> > s_strl{cat,cpy} function definitions.
>
> I now think these should be macros which do the if() test and the errx.
Can you post a proposed diff?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010730090036.A59209>