Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:52:09 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r286170 - head/share/man/man9 Message-ID: <CABh_MKkCOnWA34xPNn05-JmPY6Axud5ur1og3m4-1H8u-faZmA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55C09869.2040605@selasky.org> References: <201508020022.t720MFqp023071@repo.freebsd.org> <20150802145434.V1128@besplex.bde.org> <CABh_MKm3cWbPu6WiP9i%2BF-6CuuAH-UAGcek8jEbN0ZxjNZ5GeA@mail.gmail.com> <55C09869.2040605@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2015-08-04 12:48 GMT+02:00 Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>: > Once C-compilers finally decide to compile time support queues, we should throw queue.3 aswell? If the API provided by the C standard would be functionally identical and easy to emulate with older compilers (which is the case for _Static_assert), then yes. Meaning: we should put a notice at the top of the man page that the C standard functionality should be used instead. -- Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands KvK/VAT number: 62051717
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABh_MKkCOnWA34xPNn05-JmPY6Axud5ur1og3m4-1H8u-faZmA>