Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:14:48 -0400
From:      Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>,  freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: intermittent bsdtar/jemalloc failures
Message-ID:  <CAMw1wOx3H1Jt8gbgnX7U44QY-oqaFCLRQvwSt%2BVZ6P72_u5deg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <YV9ikUWwz7rQtJ3X@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <2908d747-8606-84d6-60b5-249c0d396b6b@protected-networks.net> <YV9NBCZOnpefRNXP@kib.kiev.ua> <31be6e3a-f303-ce78-4dab-5dcc77ed0464@protected-networks.net> <YV9eJLPdHSWtl5hh@nuc> <YV9ikUWwz7rQtJ3X@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0000000000005d179005cdc9c195
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu., Oct. 7, 2021, 17:11 Konstantin Belousov, <kostikbel@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:52:52PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:18:28PM -0400, Michael Butler via
> freebsd-current wrote:
> > > On 10/7/21 15:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:28:44PM -0400, Michael Butler via
> freebsd-current wrote:
> > > >> While building a local release bundle, I sometimes get bsdtar
> failing (and
> > > >> dumping core) as follows below. Worse, as can be seen below, it
> doesn't stop
> > > >> the build unless I happen to notice and it yields an incomplete
> package.
> > > >>
> > > >> a usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_checksum.h
> > > >> a usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_message.h
> > > >> a usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_echo.c
> > > >> a usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_gif.h
> > > >> <jemalloc>: jemalloc_arena.c:747: Failed assertion:
> > > >> "nstime_compare(&decay->epoch, &time) <= 0"
> > > >> Abort trap (core dumped)
> > > >> sh /usr/src/release/scripts/make-manifest.sh *.txz > MANIFEST
> > > >>
> > > >> What causes this? Build machine is a 2x4-core Intel box with ZFS
> > > >> file-systems all around. I tried stopping NTPD temporarily but the
> failures
> > > >> persist .. sometimes :-(
> > > >>
> > > >> I've seen this at different points in the archiving process so it
> doesn't
> > > >> seem specific to building kernel.txz.
> > > >
> > > > What timecounter do you use? Perhaps show the whole output from
> > > > sysctl kern.timecounter.
> > >
> > > imb@vm01:/home/imb> sysctl kern.timecounter
> > > kern.timecounter.tsc_shift: 1
> > > kern.timecounter.smp_tsc_adjust: 0
> > > kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 1
> > > kern.timecounter.invariant_tsc: 1
> > > kern.timecounter.fast_gettime: 1
> > > kern.timecounter.tick: 1
> > > kern.timecounter.choice: ACPI-fast(900) HPET(950) i8254(0)
> TSC-low(1000)
> > > dummy(-1000000)
> > > kern.timecounter.hardware: HPET
> > > kern.timecounter.alloweddeviation: 5
> > > kern.timecounter.timehands_count: 2
> > > kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.quality: 900
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.frequency: 3579545
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.counter: 16124892
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.mask: 16777215
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.HPET.quality: 950
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.HPET.frequency: 14318180
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.HPET.counter: 1883995229
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.HPET.mask: 4294967295
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.quality: 0
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.frequency: 1193182
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.counter: 57
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.mask: 65535
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.quality: 1000
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.frequency: 1413153007
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.counter: 2352002295
> > > kern.timecounter.tc.TSC-low.mask: 4294967295
> > >
> > > I overrode the default selection of counter-type as NTPD drifted so
> > > badly as to require stepping almost hourly :-(
> >
> > Could you show output from
> >
> > # kldload cpuctl
> > # cpucontrol -i 0x15 /dev/cpuctl0
> > # cpucontrol -i 0x16 /dev/cpuctl0
> >
> > as well as a copy of the dmesg after a boot?  I am looking at a similar
> > problem currently.
>
> Do you have the issue with jemalloc(3), or the problem with imprecise TSC
> frequency as reported by CPUID leaf?
>

Only the latter, but I did not try overriding the time counter selection.

>

--0000000000005d179005cdc9c195--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMw1wOx3H1Jt8gbgnX7U44QY-oqaFCLRQvwSt%2BVZ6P72_u5deg>