Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:56:02 -0500 From: Bart Kus <bsd@shell-server.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio modification Message-ID: <200109301226.0779@EO> In-Reply-To: <3802.1001864301@critter> References: <3802.1001864301@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 30 September 2001 10:38, you wrote: > Your machine will not work too well if it is 40kHz. > > The PPS-API allows you to timestamp edges on DCD, if the frequency is > more reasonable, that would work for you. Find RFC27xx for more info > about PPS-API. Oh really. I was actually reading pps.c, and it looked like it was for the parallel port interrupt pin only. I'd rather avoid cutting up this connector if I can. Is the DCD edge timestamp (which would be PERFECT) already implemented, or is this a spec for me to write for when modifying sio.c? If I do have to write something, for my work to be included anywhere, I should be writing for the -CURRENT kernel, right? I presently run -STABLE, so that would obviously be the more comfortable kernel to write for...but it is *STABLE* after all. --Bart PS: That's RFC2783 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109301226.0779>