Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:21:12 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Ulf Lilleengen <ulf.lilleengen@gmail.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*? Message-ID: <D6738680-5482-4349-8781-1645CD719077@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20090218170043.GA76148@carrot> References: <16678.1234910124@critter.freebsd.dk> <B0DD65C3-4792-47C4-9BBE-E33BD58EA537@mac.com> <20090218170043.GA76148@carrot>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 18, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > How about the way that was done in GEOM_MBR? Defining a verb like > "write > MBR", and supply the mbr as a parameter with gctl? (Currently used by > boot0cfg). There's already averb to write bootcode, There's just no verb (yet) to read bootcode. -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D6738680-5482-4349-8781-1645CD719077>