Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:50:04 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PCIOCGETCONF/PCIOCREAD requires write permission? Message-ID: <20001208115004.B81619@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200012080707.AAA12102@freeway.dcfinc.com>; from chad@DCFinc.com on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 12:07:49AM -0700 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012021342100.5019-100000@zeppo.feral.com> <200012080707.AAA12102@freeway.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 12:07:49AM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> I thought the space staked out by the *BSD gang was approximately
> this:
> NetBSD - the least amount of platform-specific code possible; run
> on most anything
> OpenBSD - pro-active security, bullet-proof from attacks
> FreeBSD - best performing on the Intel PC platform
s/the Intel PC/server/ The Alpha has very good I/O bandwidth and 64-bit
address space. Thus it fits our niche. You also mentioned Sparc, but
really should have said sparc64(pci based).
hopefully embeded soon too.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001208115004.B81619>