Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:41:27 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PR 21998 - outgoing ident. Message-ID: <200101101641.aa18613@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:19:18 EST." <200101101619.LAA34225@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I've read through and tested the patch, and is seems like a reasonable > > idea. Basically, it adds a flag to sockets which have been created > > via an accept() and then adds a new getcred_outgoing sysctl which > > works just like getcred but returns EPERM it is not a outgoing > > socket. > I think this is the wrong way around. There is enough information in > the PCB dump for identd to determine whether the socket was active- or > passive-open; identd should do the work itself. I presume you mean that getcred_outgoing should do the work itself rather than having identd grovel around in the kernel itself? Can you point me at the field(s) in inpcb I should be looking at? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200101101641.aa18613>