Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:11:16 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/led Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in Message-ID: <20010607121116.I85324@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B1FACD3.DF31682@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:33:23PM %2B0300 References: <200106070926.f579QqU16744@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010607071406.Y81224@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B1FACD3.DF31682@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:33:23PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > I do not see a reason for such a strict requirement here. People want features today, > not N days from now (for most packages release rolling is not a very quick process). I > think that our repo is able to bear the costs involved, especially considering that > ports Attics are being emptied regularly, so there is no cumulative effect. What are you smoking? They have only been emptied three times in the last 3 years that I remember! If the package in question isn't going to be generated before the next release (say one week) then it definitely should be a concern when adding patches that would be in that release, since bento doesn't upload the packages to ftp-master more than once a week, as far as i know. -- wca [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7H7W0F47idPgWcsURAvOwAJ4vi6KqY/kWQjvFtReazsN4Du+jmwCfSZ9D 0cAqm0LscvpRCgaLDstEXQM= =LFN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010607121116.I85324>