Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:32:49 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world Message-ID: <4D839741.5090200@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <640331300457849@web22.yandex.ru> References: <4D7BED01.6000506@FreeBSD.org> <201103160028.01687.avilla@freebsd.org> <241821300263308@web137.yandex.ru> <201103160933.48175.avilla@freebsd.org> <105381300365591@web53.yandex.ru> <123121300367234@web45.yandex.ru> <4D8245D4.6070705@gmx.de> <640331300457849@web22.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 18.03.2011 15:17, schrieb Konstantin Tokarev: > > > 17.03.2011, 20:33, "Matthias Andree"<matthias.andree@gmx.de>: >> Not necessarily. If it's a documented extension that you'd allowed (and >> even by sticking to the implicit gnu89 language default of GCC) then >> you'll hardly hear back anything else than "invalid, works as documented". > > Note that Clang supports c89 and gnu89 modes[1] > > [1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#c_modes With reservations, namely extensions not implemented yet, or intentionally unsupported extensions - and the list does not claim to be complete. BTW, please configure your software to not quote addresses. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D839741.5090200>