Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 10:00:51 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPi4B and self-hosted buildworld buildkernel times: using more than -j3 is a waste in my tests. Message-ID: <20200815100051.10b1d9442c2c739e36f8c7e5@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <D1FE2E6A-F83A-41AE-87FE-44BBA1CF09A8@yahoo.com> References: <D1FE2E6A-F83A-41AE-87FE-44BBA1CF09A8.ref@yahoo.com> <D1FE2E6A-F83A-41AE-87FE-44BBA1CF09A8@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 00:23:58 -0700 Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote: > So: much less time required compared to the RPi4B at the > same clock rate. (The MACCHIATObin has a SATA SSD but > buildworld buildkernel is not I/O bound.) Still given the difference in price the Rpi4B doesn't come off too badly in the comparison. I keep thinking about the double shot for my next router, do you know how well it does PPPoE under FreeBSD (or anything else for that matter) ? -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200815100051.10b1d9442c2c739e36f8c7e5>