Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 01:47:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> To: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: making the snoop device loadable. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007100146400.88568-100000@login-1.eunet.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007091411480.407-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I dont like kernel changes that make the kernel do less babysitting and me > more. Tough, I guess. I believe it is general consensus that Unix should be a tool to be used or abused as the end-user sees fit, to the extent that the admin fails to do such babysitting himself, and that it is Unix' task to avoid babysitting to whatever extent is possible. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10007100146400.88568-100000>