Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:45:49 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mikhail Kruk <meshko@polkan2.dyndns.org> Cc: Christopher Schulte <christopher@schulte.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: procmail, squid: any takers? Message-ID: <20010827174549.D48093@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0108271948140.45703-100000@localhost>; from meshko@polkan2.dyndns.org on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:55:40PM -0400 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827182914.00b00e88@pop.schulte.org> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0108271948140.45703-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IMjqdzrDRly81ofr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:55:40PM -0400, Mikhail Kruk wrote: > > People who follow RELENG_4_X may be able to stay on top of these things > > easier, as we can see the changes more clearly in cvsup, and > > /usr/src/UPDATING now seems to document every commit to this branch. N= ice > > new feature, IMHO. >=20 > Hm... I don't see anything about sendmail in UPDATING. Also things like > procmail which are ports don't go into updating anyway, right? That's not the point of UPDATING, which documents pitfalls in the upgrade procedure. Kris --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7ium8Wry0BWjoQKURAujHAJ47jnCi7GU8CVWrPNh+dgMte0opjACdH1rn jZmo83NvLqkv4zJo9vEMbkA= =m4Nb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010827174549.D48093>