Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:12:43 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re: proper way to make kernel... Message-ID: <20010322161242.A17495@student.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <200103221449.PAA86223@lurza.secnetix.de>; from olli@secnetix.de on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:44PM %2B0100 References: <20010321205923.A1882@student.uu.se> <200103221449.PAA86223@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:44PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> wrote: > > And besides, the former (using KERNCONF) *is* the preferred way to > > compile a kernel. > > Why? > > I think it's only preferred (and even required) when you do > a make world. If you just changed something in your kernel > config file and then build a new one (maybe without even > having /usr/src except for sys), then the standard way to do > it is the usual "config, make depend, make, make install". > > Regards > Oliver > In the particular case you describe when you just change the kernel config file and the sources you are building from are the same as were originally used to compile the world then "config, make depend, make, make install" will work just fine. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010322161242.A17495>