Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 23:20:21 -0700 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? Message-ID: <CAG=rPVcWVPZoG1=c3U2ArJLEH%2BdF2kPxkfihs4J872pH9LJ0mQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BE67D12E-E8AB-401E-8B45-6BE56C1DF2FB@ipfw.ru> References: <CAG=rPVe_JGy%2BeUiDjHaXXi5=n2mWGOeZjHkbVeUeS_m1z1_uMg@mail.gmail.com> <BE67D12E-E8AB-401E-8B45-6BE56C1DF2FB@ipfw.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@ipfw.ru> wrote: > > On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? > Are there any tests results showing performance implications on different > network-related workloads? > > Alexander, Do you have a testbed where you could run a quick network test for non-virtualized workload: -> CURRENT without VIMAGE in kernel config -> CURRENT with VIMAGE in kernel config and provide some results ? -- Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG=rPVcWVPZoG1=c3U2ArJLEH%2BdF2kPxkfihs4J872pH9LJ0mQ>