Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:08:05 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The upcoming GCC 3.3+ upgrade Message-ID: <20030709220805.GA28401@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030709173528.5db2dc02.ak03@gte.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307091422430.22588-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307091426470.22588-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030709173528.5db2dc02.ak03@gte.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 05:35:28PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) > Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > > > > > p.s. this does not mean that I do not appreciate the work you are > > doing to keep our compiler up to date.. Keep up the good work. > > > > Julian, > > there was nothing in your question that could possibly offend me. I do > not take comments about GCC suckage personally. Yes, GCC 3.3 compilation > speed is likely to suffer a bit compared to 3.2, although the change > should be pretty minimal. There are examples where GCC 3.3 even beats > 3.2 in compilation speed, but I would not keep much hope :) > > The GCC folks have started to take compilation speed seriously in 3.4 > branch, we'll see if changed attitude will make a difference in their > next major release. Do you per chance know how the speed is on Alpha (or non-IA32 CPUs in general)? -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030709220805.GA28401>