Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:54:02 +0200 (CEST) From: "Philip S. Schulz" <schulzp@gmx.de> To: Marc Ramirez <mrami@bluecirclesoft.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stupid question: 6.0b1 LORs - who wants 'em? Message-ID: <20050724114706.P68174@dhcppc2> In-Reply-To: <20050724050937.GB824@www.bluecirclesoft.com> References: <20050724050937.GB824@www.bluecirclesoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Marc Ramirez wrote: > I'm running 6.0-BETA1 to help out the effort, and I got a lock order > reversal. I assume I'll get more. > > Should I be filing PRs for these? Posting them here? > Checking the LOR page at http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html first generally is a good idea, then posting here. > Is there better debugging info I can turn on? > I think the ones you've already got are good enough to see whether or not it is already known. If somebody wants to investigate further they'll tell you what to do. > Which is better, salmon or tuna? > > Jul 23 21:41:25 devel kernel: lock order reversal > Jul 23 21:41:25 devel kernel: 1st 0xc097e140 UMA lock (UMA lock) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1475 > Jul 23 21:41:25 devel kernel: 2nd 0xc1061144 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2317 > Jul 23 21:41:25 devel kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: I see this one too and it looks like item #109 on the LOR list so it is already known. Regards, Philip.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050724114706.P68174>