Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:19:16 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B" <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getaddrinfo and the UNIX domain Message-ID: <20001029131915.A69752@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <y7vg0lfpqz5.wl@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>; from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:11:26AM %2B0900 References: <20001028163909.A77420@hamlet.nectar.com> <y7vvgucpcp4.wl@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> <20001029100529.B26020@spawn.nectar.com> <y7vg0lfpqz5.wl@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:11:26AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote: > I admit you could say that (thus I added "in my understanding" in my > previous message). Anyway, the problem is that there's no standard > about combination of PF_UNIX and getaddrinfo(), as itojun pointed out. Yes, just to be clear, I think we're in agreement here :-) -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001029131915.A69752>