Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Aug 2001 15:47:55 +0900
From:      Saeki Takashi <saeki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:        saeki@jp.FreeBSD.org, saeki@ba2.so-net.ne.jp
Subject:   docs/29688: Trivial typographic error in porters-handbook.
Message-ID:  <20010812154755L.saeki@ba2.so-net.ne.jp>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         29688
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Trivial typographic error in porters-handbook
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Aug 13 17:30:24 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Saeki Takashi <saeki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
jp.freebsd.org
>Environment:
	System: FreeBSD aqua4 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #2: Wed Jul 11 14:49:19 PDT 2001 saeki@aqua4:/usr/src/sys/compile/AQUA i386

>Description:
	I found some trivial typographic error in doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml
	during translation work into Japanese.
	In addition to the attached patch, a sentence from line 798
	have three '(' and four ')'.
	I think this as parenthesis nesting error,
	but can't guess correct nesting, sorry.

>How-To-Repeat:
	see http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml

>Fix:
*** book.sgml-en.160	Sun Aug 12 15:08:23 2001
--- book.sgml-en.new	Sun Aug 12 15:08:23 2001
***************
*** 800,806 ****
  	    from an earlier epoch to fail (i.e. the package would not
  	    be detected as out of date): the new version number (e.g.
  	    <literal>1.0,1</literal> in the above example) is still
! 	    numerically less than the previous version (2000801), but
  	    the <literal>,1</literal> suffix is treated specially by
  	    automated tools and found to be greater than the implied
  	    suffix ",0" on the earlier package)</para>
--- 800,806 ----
  	    from an earlier epoch to fail (i.e. the package would not
  	    be detected as out of date): the new version number (e.g.
  	    <literal>1.0,1</literal> in the above example) is still
! 	    numerically less than the previous version (20000801), but
  	    the <literal>,1</literal> suffix is treated specially by
  	    automated tools and found to be greater than the implied
  	    suffix ",0" on the earlier package)</para>
***************
*** 3405,3411 ****
            <programlisting>-DPAGER=\"&dollar;{LOCALBASE}/bin/less\"</programlisting>
  
            if this is an X port, instead of
!           <literal>-DPAGER=\"/usr/local/bin/less\"</literal>. This way it will
            have a better chance of working if the system administrator has
            moved the whole `/usr/local' tree somewhere else.</para>
        </sect1>
--- 3405,3411 ----
            <programlisting>-DPAGER=\"&dollar;{LOCALBASE}/bin/less\"</programlisting>
  
            if this is an X port, instead of
!           <literal>-DPAGER=\"/usr/local/bin/less\".</literal> This way it will
            have a better chance of working if the system administrator has
            moved the whole `/usr/local' tree somewhere else.</para>
        </sect1>

Best Regards,
saeki
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
 Hello doc-maintainers,
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010812154755L.saeki>