Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      15 Mar 2003 01:25:02 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Peter Wu <peterwu@hotmail.com>, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Fail to build XEmacs with GTK
Message-ID:  <1047709502.75367.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030314210940.N1839@znfgre.tberna.bet>
References:  <OE51K6qSX422M3fJTmh0000e396@hotmail.com> <1047615404.66262.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030314043154.GA94526@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1047616453.66262.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030313230858.H1839@znfgre.tberna.bet> <1047645619.2553.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030314210940.N1839@znfgre.tberna.bet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 00:11, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>=20
> > On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 02:09, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > >
> > > > However, WITH/WANT_GTK are deprecated,
> > >
> > > I never saw a good explanation for this. If I just want gtk, why do I=
 have
> > > to get *_GNOME involved?
> >
> > It allowed us to scale more, and remove redundancy.  For example, you
> > can have WITH_GTK (that's fine).  But what about GTK2, GTK3, etc.?  Wit=
h
> > one macro that allows for listing, we can better accommodate things lik=
e
> > this.  After 4.8 is released, the USE_GNOMENG macro will go away, so
> > you'll be down to just USE_GNOME=3D <list>.
>=20
> Sorry, you haven't actually answered my question. Why were the gtk knobs
> sucked into gnome?  gnome is one consumer of gtk, but there are many
> others.

Don't know for sure.  This happened before my time.

>=20
> > (And, for backwards compatibility's sake, WITH_GTK will still be around
> > for a while).
>=20
> IMO, it should stay around in perpetuity.

For the reasons I listed above, I don't think this is a good idea.  Why
is it such a problem to substitute WITH_GTK with USE_GNOME=3Dgtk12?  After
all, this is documented.

Joe

>=20
> Doug
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA+csc+b2iPiv4Uz4cRAkuUAKChZUhqEd3CxnLVEpWQfnQKVGdr4wCcD00O
CgcOP/nkPx5vbLmO1KeXDuw=
=jrVR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1047709502.75367.3.camel>