Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:25:07 +0900
From:      Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>
To:        Eric F Crist <ecrist@secure-computing.net>
Cc:        freebsd-drivers@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/123053
Message-ID:  <20080425002507.GB62719@cdnetworks.co.kr>
In-Reply-To: <1F58C85A-CBD3-46A8-9392-0B5994992475@secure-computing.net>
References:  <1F58C85A-CBD3-46A8-9392-0B5994992475@secure-computing.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 05:54:13PM -0500, Eric F Crist wrote:
 > Andrey,
 > 
 > I've applied the patch to a 7.0-RELEASE-p1 source tree and rebooted my  
 > system.  The card comes UP ok, but shows the following when connected  
 > to a 100BaseT/ Full Duplex switch port:
 > 

By chance, are you referring to kern/123053?

 > re0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
 > 	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
 > 	ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80
 > 	media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP <half-duplex>)
 > 	status: active
 > 
 > Once I've assigned an IP to the interface, however, it comes up  
 > correctly and seems to function just fine.  Is there any load testing  

I think, that's normal.

 > I should perform for you folks?
 > 

Try one of network benchmarks in ports/benchmarks if you want.

 > re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu  
 > 1500
 > 	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
 > 	ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80
 > 	inet 10.0.0.38 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255
 > 	media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
 > 	status: active
 > 
 > 
 > -----
 > Eric F Crist
 > Secure Computing Networks
-- 
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080425002507.GB62719>