Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:04:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256885] [NEW PORT] www/py-homeassistant: Open-source home automation platform Message-ID: <bug-256885-21822-RSrOyWstWM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-256885-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-256885-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256885 --- Comment #28 from Ivan Rozhuk <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Dan Langille from comment #27) Yes, I also came to the conclusion that it’s easier to stick it in a virtual machine and hope that the authors don’t break it. If we look at the question more broadly, then HA is more of a universal control panel for a zoo of equipment. I mean, it’s good to try at first, but I’m scared if it breaks in 10 years, which is a very short time for a house. >From an administration point of view, it turns out to be very expensive and unreliable to have a huge amount of different equipment. Perhaps my point of view is too conservative :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-256885-21822-RSrOyWstWM>