Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:58:51 -0800 (PST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: seems to be solved in r291907: WAS: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431 Message-ID: <201512062258.tB6MwoAX043400@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From mexas Sun Dec 6 14:44:25 2015 >To: adrian@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, hps@selasky.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk >Subject: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431 >Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk >In-Reply-To: <5664472E.3090601@selasky.org> > >>From hps@selasky.org Sun Dec 6 14:41:27 2015 >> >>On 12/06/15 15:14, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> I posted this about a week ago: >>> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-November/058683.html >>> >>> The problem is that urtwn stopped >>> working in current r291431. >>> >>> I did more testing with the same revision, >>> and sometimes it would work, but extremely >>> slowly, and sometimes seemingly associate >>> but get an address of 0.0.0.0. >>> >>> I now installed 10.2-RELEASE-p8 and >>> the urtwn works fine, no issues at all. >>> >>> Does this look like a bug at some recent >>> current revision? Should I file a PR? >>> >>> I's just I recall there have been major >>> chages to wlan, so perphaps I'm forgetting >>> to change the config in recent current? >>> >>> Please advise >>> >>> Anton >> >>Hi, >> >>There is work ongoing in the WLAN drivers. Did you try the latest -current? >> >>--HPS > >r291431 was about a week ago. >Will try latest -current later today. Seems to be solved in r291907. Can anybody reproduce this? Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201512062258.tB6MwoAX043400>