Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:57:56 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <16323.31748.84583.971494@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031125151939.GB48007@madman.celabo.org> References: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com> <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.191931.67791612.imp@bsdimp.com> <16322.50980.825349.898362@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031125151939.GB48007@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques A. Vidrine writes: > > So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on with life? That certainly seems like the best compromise. Then we can end this thread ;) > That seems to have the most impact. We can also expend our efforts > to improve dynamic linking performance, since that will improve the > performance of the other 99.9% of the universe. > What happened to mdodd's prebinding efforts? Drew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16323.31748.84583.971494>