Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:56:57 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r202628 - in head: . sys/amd64/amd64 sys/i386/i386 sys/i386/xen sys/sys Message-ID: <9FF943CE-9FCB-48C8-A048-23F23620F4E5@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <201001191531.o0JFVI6n029716@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201001191531.o0JFVI6n029716@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Author: ed > Date: Tue Jan 19 15:31:18 2010 > New Revision: 202628 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/202628 > > Log: > Recommit r193732: > > Remove __gnu89_inline. > > Now that we use C99 almost everywhere, just use C99-style in the > pmap > code. Since the pmap code is the only consumer of __gnu89_inline, > remove > it from cdefs.h as well. Because the flag was only introduced 17 > months > ago, I don't expect any problems. > > Reviewed by: alc > > It was backed out, because it prevented us from building kernels > using a > 7.x compiler. Now that most people use 8.x, there is nothing that > holds > us back. Even if people run 7.x, they should be able to build a > kernel > if they run `make kernel-toolchain' or `make buildworld' first. Ok, so you've broken a legitimate piece of compatibility. What's the gain? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9FF943CE-9FCB-48C8-A048-23F23620F4E5>