Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:20:48 -0500 From: David Rankin <drankin@bohemians.lexington.ky.us> To: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@pobox.com> Cc: Markus Friedl <markus.friedl@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>, security@FreeBSD.org, openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org, Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal Message-ID: <20000103162048.A4248@rumpole.bohemians.lexington.ky.us> In-Reply-To: <20000103152112.C18625@ntrnet.net>; from Jim Knoble on Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:21:12PM -0500 References: <20000102151208.A21548@folly.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001021441330.8076-100000@green.dyndns.org> <20000103092733.B3780@rumpole.bohemians.lexington.ky.us> <20000103152112.C18625@ntrnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:21:12PM -0500, Jim Knoble wrote: > Is there a reason why we ought not to use openssh-unix-dev? It's > already here, and i suspect most folks on the list would be interested > in an SSH-Protocol-2.0 implementation. I don't particularly think it's > off-topic, either (except for the bit about whether certain folks can > be communicated with effectively). It's Damien's list, so his will be the deciding opinion, but IMHO openssh-unix-dev isn't the best place for the discussion since it's for development of the OpenSSH 1.2.1 port. OpenSSH 2.0 is going to be (at first) a design and organization effort that will interfere with the "daily business" of OpenSSH 1.2 on a shared list. Thanks, David -- David W. Rankin, Jr. Husband, Father, and UNIX Sysadmin. Email: drankin@bohemians.lexington.ky.us Address/Phone Number: Ask me. "It is no great thing to be humble when you are brought low; but to be humble when you are praised is a great and rare accomplishment." St. Bernard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000103162048.A4248>