Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 08:58:03 -0400 From: Mark Conway Wirt <mark@intrepid.net> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? Message-ID: <19990625085803.A14126@intrepid.net> In-Reply-To: <19990624195332.F1893@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai on Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 07:53:32PM %2B0200 References: <00c901bebe64$f5267d60$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> <19990624195332.F1893@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 07:53:32PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > * Leif Neland (leifn@neland.dk) [990624 19:17]: > > > > Why not use uucp? Is it just considered old-fashioned, nobody understands > > how to set it up, or are there heavy reasons not to use uucp? > > It seems nowadays nobody knows how to set it up anymore. I Think it's more appropriate to say that "nowadays no MTA seem to understand it" ;-) I hate issuing static IP's to dialup accounts -- even business class, but with both MS Exchange and Lotus's products, you have no choice. They're a bit brain dead.... --Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990625085803.A14126>