Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 02:28:57 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" <pvoigt@uos.de> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl? Message-ID: <20150512022857.7230c163@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com> References: <20150509125643.0bda93e6@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <554EEBB5.8010304@rawbw.com> <20150511202110.34e6e29c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55510C22.9050900@rawbw.com> <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 May 2015 15:34:55 -0700
Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 15:02, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> > OK, I currently haven't firefox installed and did not download the
> > package to do this test myself. But your results go along with the
> > output of "make run-depends-list". And back to my initial question:
> > Why does "pkg install firefox" in spite of this insist on
> > installing port openssl?
>
> # pkg install porttree && porttree www/firefox
> shows all places the port depends on others in tree-like fashion.
>
Thanks for your hint to porttree, however, on my system:
# pkg install porttree
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
The following 3 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):
New packages to be INSTALLED:
porttree: 0.3.r52
py27-networkx: 1.8.1
openssl: 1.0.2_1
The process will require 18 MiB more space.
4 MiB to be downloaded.
Proceed with this action? [y/N]: N
What is wrong with my system? Why does porttree need port openssl as
well. It is obviosuly wrong. If I build ports-mgmt/porttree from
source, there is not dependency from port openssl. Might there be
something wrong with my package database? How can I fix?
I will answer tomorrow to other aspects of your latest posts.
Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150512022857.7230c163>