Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:45:19 +0100 From: "horcy" <apehaar@text-only.demon.nl> To: "budsz" <budsz@kumprang.or.id> Cc: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:44.filedesc] Message-ID: <005201c2b735$5483aae0$0201a8c0@JOS> References: <20030108162158.GC48296@kumprang.or.id> <004101c2b732$89d59940$0201a8c0@JOS> <20030108163957.GA49337@kumprang.or.id>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Ok, so I'am only recompile kernel and fix that problem. Yup. But if you were planning to do a cvsup this week. Why not do it now. Saves you some time because the cvsup will contain the patch too ;) horcy ----- Original Message ----- From: "budsz" <budsz@kumprang.or.id> To: "horcy" <apehaar@text-only.demon.nl> Cc: "FreeBSD-Security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:44.filedesc] On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:25:20PM +0100, horcy wrote: >The question: > >If I periodicly upgrade with cvsup stable and compile kernel it's will fix >that problem, or I must patch only. does cvsup will replace all of >source? >--------------------------- >Answer: > >if you cvsup to stable it will fix it and of course the patch will fix it. >But you still have to recompile you kernel, so to if it was time for your >cvsup stable then i sould suggest you do that. Both will take some time. >So i would go for the cvsup. Ok, so I'am only recompile kernel and fix that problem. -- budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005201c2b735$5483aae0$0201a8c0>