Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:44:18 +0000
From:      "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To:        Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Philippe Audeoud <jadawin@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL Makefile distinfo
Message-ID:  <CAGFTUwOdXKnC5aYyrd%2B54aTb8WH3U5kDdteDW2xoCWKf99-f=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo838cU8BBqkHNL8AU3Lu0mhz9eST7Xq9TBBVWVzuhhtAvEA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201112090933.pB99XU1p057960@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EE25274.5040602@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838cU8BBqkHNL8AU3Lu0mhz9eST7Xq9TBBVWVzuhhtAvEA@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 12/9/11, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2011 18:25, "Doug Barton" <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Surely there's a lot of value placed on being in sync with upstream?
>

If there are no changes relevant to FreeBSD, there is little value in
updating, and some cost, since updating leads to rebuilds in
package-building clusters, in tinderboxes, and on the machines of many
users.

> Are we supposed to pick and choose updates based on the maintainer's whims?

Of course not on whims, but on the changes in the new version.

b.


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFTUwOdXKnC5aYyrd%2B54aTb8WH3U5kDdteDW2xoCWKf99-f=Q>