Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:59:23 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko <doublef@tele-kom.ru> To: Chris Pressey <cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Beginning C++ in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20040429025923.GA2015@Shark.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20040428101138.38e25081.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> References: <20040425215837.3f4708fe.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> <20040426094335.GA7578@online.fr> <20040426115842.GA4144@Shark.localdomain> <xzphdv5wq2q.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040427160737.GA1325@Shark.localdomain> <xzpr7u918jv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040428023920.GA382@Shark.localdomain> <xzpfzao18gd.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040428163104.GA10537@Shark.localdomain> <20040428101138.38e25081.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Chris Pressey probably wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:31:04 +0400 > Sergey Zaharchenko <doublef@tele-kom.ru> wrote: > > > > If I take out every word about main() from C's specification (making > > it an ordinary function), will the resulting `language' stay > > Turing-complete? > > Not AFAIK. > > > If not, why? > > You no longer have a start state. > What if I add `The function with the same name as the executable starts the program's execution like main() does in C'? -- DoubleF Decision maker, n.: The person in your office who was unable to form a task force before the music stopped. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAkG+Lwo7hT/9lVdwRAvTQAJ0f6cSKEIkPLrJnwJnlUtVQx7O6/wCcDhG5 q0DpeZUjUNfAVbHvUbbUie0= =Xl9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040429025923.GA2015>