Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:42:47 +0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] remove GNU rcs from FreeBSD 12
Message-ID:  <9b697cbc-70d1-c113-2815-b70b026fbf7b@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <75d4d233-c599-0509-139a-5799a0911b5a@nomadlogic.org>
References:  <20160911133804.a7j7p3x2viqzcpec@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20161025182730.GA60030@klump.hjerdalen.lokalnett> <b1807e56-2be5-28fa-c570-d58a9962e06d@freebsd.org> <75d4d233-c599-0509-139a-5799a0911b5a@nomadlogic.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/11/2016 10:45 AM, Pete Wright wrote:
>
>
> On 11/02/2016 19:17, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 26/10/2016 2:27 AM, Eivind Nicolay Evensen wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:38:04PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> For long we are planning to remove GNU rcs from base, after a 
>>>> failed attempt
>>>> before FreeBSD 10.0. Let see where we are to be able to remove it 
>>>> from FreeBSD
>>>> 12.
>>
>> why should we remove it?
>> What will replace it?  it's an integral part of many people's systems.
>>
>> Is there a non gnu RCS with the same features?
>>
>
> surprised to hear so many people are dependent upon having rcs in 
> their base system.  there are options though - for example OpenBSD 
> uses OpenRCS in their base:
I don't see what is surprising about it.
It's been common "best practice" for decades to keep all your files in 
/etc under source control. RCS fits he bill well and many people have 
it in their muscle memory.

>
> http://man.openbsd.org/rcs.1
>
> its not strictly GNU compliant as I believe it adheres to the 
> original implementation (which frankly is probably a good thing 
> imho).  GNU RCS is also available via ports/pkgs as well.
>
> If people are adamant about preserving a rcs binary in base though 
> this seems like a great opportunity to step up and help 
> import/support OpenRCS.

that's ok by me as long as:
1/ it can continue to read all the old data
2/ it works the same (for scripts etc)

>
> just my two bits - hope it helps.
>
> -pete
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9b697cbc-70d1-c113-2815-b70b026fbf7b>