Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 23:01:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality Message-ID: <bug-207087-2472-L3VmXGlJNq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-207087-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-207087-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207087 --- Comment #23 from g_amanakis@yahoo.com --- Created attachment 167004 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D167004&action= =3Dedit ffoff.pcapng I did another dump on a client on the local network (directly connected to gateway, no OpenVPN involved). The gateway ran 10.2-STABLE r295264 GENERIC.= The symptoms when fastforwarding was enabled were the same as with r295285. I did 2 dumps on the client:=20 net.inet.fastforwarding=3D0 on the gateway =3D=3D=3D> ffoff.pcapng =3D=3D= =3D> HTTP/GET happens at packet 10 net.inet.fastforwarding=3D1 on the gateway =3D=3D=3D> ffon.pcapng =3D=3D=3D= > HTTP/GET happens at packet 36 The only significant difference I see is that when fastforwarding is turned= off the gateway sends an ICMP Fragmentation needed to the client whereas when fastforwarding is on this doesn't happen, and the client keeps retransmitti= ng the HTTP/GET packet. Could it be that the ip_fastfwd.c doesn't correctly se= nd ICMP when the destination is unreachable and fragmentation is required? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207087-2472-L3VmXGlJNq>