Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 02:18:00 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org> Cc: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SGI, XFS and OSS? Message-ID: <19990521021800.S76043@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990520200752.8214A-100000@beelzebubba.sysabend.org>; from Jamie Bowden on Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:08:14PM -0400 References: <199905202050.QAA16666@gatekeeper.itribe.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.990520200752.8214A-100000@beelzebubba.sysabend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:08:14PM -0400, Jamie Bowden wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > :> This is great news. My slowest SGI systems have faster metadata updates > :> than my fastest FreeBSD systems, same disk hardware. > : > :Running soft updates? > > XFS is -FAST- How do you measure the speed of XFS vs FFS? I cannot think of any really decent benchmark without having implementations of both in the same OS, and being certain that they are optimized the same way. Don't the O2s have NVRAM for logging the metadata changes? That'd make a tremendous difference right away... Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990521021800.S76043>