Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 19:02:25 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Maxim V Filimonov <che@bein.link> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No pkg-1.6 on FreeBSD 10.2? Message-ID: <20150927170225.GY16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <5241153.XFegVDgiRr@thinkpad> References: <3701506.t2rT67cocA@thinkpad> <20150927080439.GW16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5241153.XFegVDgiRr@thinkpad>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:11:32PM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > On Sunday 27 September 2015 10:04:40 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 05:21:49AM +0300, Maxim V Filimonov wrote: > > > Hi, I'm using two versions of FreeBSD: 10.1 on my virtual server and 10.2 > > > on my home machines. On 10.1, pkg has updated to 1.6, but not on 10.2. Is > > > this the normal behavior? Is it going to update soon? > > > > Since 10.2 the releases now uses quarterly packages which are stable for 3 > > month. > > > > pkg 1.6 will be part of the next quarterly which will appear at the > > beginning of October. > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt > > Thank you for your kind reply. Here's another question: does portsnap now > fetch the ports from the quarterly branch? I just want my ports to be in sync > with my packages. To use the quarterly branch, I might fetch the ports via svn > explicitly. Same with the latest one. But what's the default behavior for > portsnap now? Is it the same as it used to be? > I'm sorry but the answer so far is no :( I would love to see that happen. Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlYIISEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExbYgCgrsErvcCWQKonB56or8MaFGj8 96oAoJscqXgqN3oCN9XuVzsRxqyyecBv =Facn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150927170225.GY16800>