Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:43:37 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>, Ben Woods <woodsb02@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Message-ID: <fe489e0f-f05a-8d85-6ef7-0f3bd7b6f9f4@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DEC=jhQdxOLjUGs9nr%2B2n733XJfWKjTKYbAY7eubRkRQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <202001150747.00F7lqiG071097@repo.freebsd.org> <CAPjTQNHa9Um%2B0S8zMD3eeop3YSdVti0o=DSv5%2BB=455wcrq3VA@mail.gmail.com> <ed0b16af-01c8-62fe-918a-3f1f9f9dcbd8@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfpOw54MQsW4aohLn3ufgEqK8beTe_EdjYktViFubPPyzg@mail.gmail.com> <aea3e071-61bd-399d-1d1f-cce4125b2480@grosbein.net> <CAPyFy2DEC=jhQdxOLjUGs9nr%2B2n733XJfWKjTKYbAY7eubRkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
16.01.2020 4:41, Ed Maste wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 16:10, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> wrote: >> >> There are multiple scenarios there ZFS may be sub-optimal at least: small i386 virtual guests >> or 32-bit only hardware like AMD Geode, or big amd64 SSD-only systems with bhyve and multiple guests >> that need lots of memory and should not fight with ZFS for RAM etc. > > That may well be the case, but our defaults should represent the > configuration that's desirable to the largest set of users, and IMO > that's ZFS in most cases today. > > It might be that we should default to UFS on i386 and ZFS on amd64? UFS may be better for any virtual guest having RAM less or equal to 4GB.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fe489e0f-f05a-8d85-6ef7-0f3bd7b6f9f4>