Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:07:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe@ptc.spbu.ru>, Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009161905520.61197-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <39C3FAC6.8EE8D7D2@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Doug Barton wrote: > One solution to this is to tend to your local sources with cvs instead >of cvsup. That way when you update your patches will be preserved. If >you don't want to keep a complete repo locally, anoncvs will still allow >you to use cvs to stay up to date. Of course, he could also learn to use cvsup's refuse file to keep the patch in place. > Obviously the better solution is to get the patch committed... I should think this patch adds sufficiently useful functionality to warrant that. Has anybody stepped forward to present a reason it should not be committed? Brandon D. Valentine -- bandix at looksharp.net | bandix at structbio.vanderbilt.edu "Truth suffers from too much analysis." -- Ancient Fremen Saying To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009161905520.61197-100000>